Factors Affecting Cage Obliquity and the Relationship between Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at the L4-L5 Level

Objective@#: This retrospective study investigated the factors that affect cage obliquity angle despite orthogonal maneuvers performed during oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and assessed the relationship between cage obliquity angle and radiological outcomes post-surgery. @*Methods@#: Twenty-nine males who underwent L4-L5 OLIF for lumbar degenerative disease between 2019 and 2021 with a followup duration greater than 12 months were analyzed. Radiological parameters were measured including psoas muscle volume, total psoas area index (total psoas muscle area [cm2]/height squared [m2]), distance from the iliac artery to the origin of the psoas muscle (DIAPM), angle between the origin of the psoas muscle and the center of the vertebral disc (APCVD), iliac crest height, disc height, lumbar flexibility (lumbar flexion angle minus extension angle), cage location ratio, cage-induced segmental lumbar lordosis (LL) (postoperative index level segmental LL minus used cage angle), foraminal height changes, fusion grade. @*Results@#: DIAPM, APCVD, iliac crest height, postoperative index level segmental LL, and cage-induced segmental LL were significantly correlated with OLIF cage obliquity angle. However, other radiological parameters did not correlate with cage obliquity. Based on multiple regression analysis, the predictive equation for the OLIF cage obliquity angle was 13.062–0.318×DIAPM+0.325×A PCVD+0.174×iliac crest height. The greater the cage obliquity, the smaller the segmental LL compared to the cage angle used. @*Conclusion@#: At the L4-L5 level, OLIF cage obliquity was affected by DIAPM, APCVD, and iliac crest height, and as the cage obliquity angle increases, LL agnle achievable by the used cage could not be obtained.

Leptomeningeal Spread at the Diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Case Report and Literature Review

Approximately two-thirds of glioblastoma (GBM) patients progress to leptomeningeal spread (LMS) within two years. While 90% of LMS cases are diagnosed during the progression and/or recurrence of GBM (defined as secondary LMS), LMS presentation at the time of GBM diagnosis (defined as primary LMS) is very rare. 18 F-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography ( 18F-FDG PET/CT) study helps to diagnose the multifocal spread of the malignant primary brain tumor. Our patient was a 31-year-old man with a tumorous lesion located in the right temporal lobe, a wide area of the leptomeninges, and spinal cord (thoracic 5/6, and lumbar 1 level) involvement as a concurrent manifestation. After the removal of the right temporal tumor, the clinical status progressed rapidly, showing signs of increased intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus caused by LMS. He underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt a week after craniotomy. During management, progression of cord compression, paraplegia, bone marrow suppression related to radiochemotherapy, intercurrent infections, and persistent ascites due to peritoneal metastasis of the LMS through the shunt system was observed. The patient finally succumbed to the disease nine months after the diagnosis of simultaneous GBM and LMS. The overall survival of primary LMS with GBM in our case was nine months, which is shorter than that of secondary LMS with GBM. The survival period after the diagnosis of LMS did not seem to be significantly different between primary and secondary LMS. To determine the prognostic effect and difference between primary and secondary LMS, further cooperative studies with large-volume data analysis are warranted.

Comparison between Active and Gravity-based Phacoemulsification Fluidics Systems in Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes during phacoemulsification when using active fluidics (Centurion®) and gravity-based fluidics (Infiniti®) in immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. METHODS: From January 2015 to September 2015, 68 eyes of 34 patients with bilateral cataract were assigned to receive immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery by Centurion® in one eye and Infiniti® in the other eye. We measured and compared intraoperative factors, including cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), ultrasound time, mean amount of balanced salt solution (BSS) used, and pain using a scale. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were also evaluated preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Intraoperative measurements showed significantly less CDE (5.05 ± 2.18 vs. 7.05 ± 3.82), ultrasound time (24.65 ± 9.68 vs. 34.95 ± 17.95 seconds), and mean amount of BSS used (37.06 ± 10.25 vs. 44.88 ± 16.38 mL) in the Centurion® group than in the Infiniti® group (p = 0.011, p = 0.005, p = 0.021, respectively). The intraoperative pain scale was 0.26 ± 0.51 in the Centurion® group and 0.50 ± 0.71 in the Infiniti® group, and was not significantly different (p = 0.121). BCVA, increase of CCT and decrease of ECD were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of phacoemulsification in the Centurion® group was superior to that in the Infiniti® group. The level of intraoperative pain and clinical outcomes 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Laser Blended Vision and Monovision Laser Refractive Surgery for Presbyopia

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Laser Blended Vision (LBV) and monovision laser refractive surgery (monovision) for presbyopia correction in patients with myopia. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 42 eyes of 21 patients with LBV and 50 eyes of 25 patients with monovision. Monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, and refractive changes were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months after the surgery and compared. The patients in the LBV group underwent further evaluation of spherical aberration 3 months after the surgery and treatment satisfaction 3-6 months after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 47.9 years in the LBV group and 41.7 years in the monovision group. Three months after surgery, the spherical equivalents were +0.11 ± 0.17 D in the dominant eye and -1.52 ± 0.36 D in the non-dominant eye in the LBV group. In contrast, the spherical equivalents were +0.23 ± 0.26 D in the dominant eye and -0.82 ± 0.28 D in the non-dominant eye in the monovision group. All patients achieved a binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 (log MAR) or better, and 86% of the LBV group and 100% of the monovision group achieved a binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity of better than 0.10. Moreover, 95% of the LBV group and 100% of the monovision group achieved a binocular uncorrected near visual acuity of better than 0.18. In the LBV group, mean spherical aberration increased after surgery than before, but it was not statistically significant. Complications such as corneal opacity that could decrease visual acuity were absent in both groups. Overall patient satisfaction after surgery was 80% in the LBV group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively higher mean age of the LBV group, both groups showed similar results regarding presbyopia correction in patients with myopia.